From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41727: 26.3; Doc of `define-minor-mode' and minor-mode commands Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 17:39:33 +0300 Message-ID: <835zc0717e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <963d4189-17dc-4f4e-9993-0335fa271e50@default> <83k10kafha.fsf@gnu.org> <9d7f8447-1c0b-46db-a40c-c1ed2a398c46@default> <838sh081lt.fsf@gnu.org>> <87wo4jb33s.fsf@web.de>> <83y2oz6j6x.fsf@gnu.org>> <30c91bcf-044c-4d93-8ca8-bd407d7bd6b0@default> <87mu5dbhqv.fsf@web.de> <9a2f8463-42a6-4f0c-82d9-de15192fffe2@default> <87h7vkbrh3.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="90350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41727@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 09 16:40:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jifQE-000NNB-Pd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:40:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56420 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jifQD-0003Pa-Qe for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jifQ2-0003Or-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jifQ2-0003wt-Be for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jifQ2-0002ek-8u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41727 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41727-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41727.159171359910193 (code B ref 41727); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2020 14:39:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60552 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jifPz-0002eL-4l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:39:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jifPx-0002e4-Ep for 41727@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:39:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jifPr-0003uB-TY; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1554 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jifPr-0008LY-93; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:39:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7vkbrh3.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:58:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181783 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 41727@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:58:32 +0200 > > We don't know if the original author intended the semantics of the > documentation or of the implementation. If we are sure the current > implementation is what was intended I would be ok with documenting it, > but it's really far from important IMHO. > > I leave it to Eli to decide. I stated my opinion. Do we have other places where a function called from Lisp uses the prefix arg in any similar way? It seems bad practice to me: non-interactive calls shouldn't use interactive features.