From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5557: is undefined Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 22:13:19 +0300 Message-ID: <835z9lkpm8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k19o32b2.fsf@gnus.org> <838sq4a1mm.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgoczbe5.fsf@gnus.org> <835zl8a0ur.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8z0zasn.fsf@gnus.org> <834l0sa0d0.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9t5suxx.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn7un19h.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18431"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 5557@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 14 21:14:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f9W-0004fb-Nj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 21:14:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43166 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f9V-0006qy-DB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f9O-0006qi-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f9O-0003LY-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f9O-0000Uj-Dm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 19:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5557 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 5557-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5557.15974324121855 (code B ref 5557); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 19:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5557) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2020 19:13:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f8u-0000Tr-14 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f8s-0000Td-TQ for 5557@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f8n-0003Jf-A1; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4704 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k6f8m-00060W-Ql; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:13:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:38:39 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:185158 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:38:39 -0700 > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, 5557@debbugs.gnu.org, > lennart.borgman@gmail.com > > Do you have any reason to believe anyone would specifically not like to > have those bindings there? I just don't want us to usurp key bindings without a good reason. Let's leave the unbound mouse gestures unbound, and leave it to the users to decide what effect they have on different parts of the display. There's no reason to force them all to do the same on any part of the display, when we don't even know what commands will be bound to them.