From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days? Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:45:18 +0300 Message-ID: <835z8kh481.fsf@gnu.org> References: <708ten8bam.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83shcu3mtf.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3mdwo0a.fsf@gnu.org> <87imcn9jmq.fsf@gnus.org> <835z8nknar.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1r97pbz.fsf@gnus.org> <835z8lk85y.fsf@gnu.org> <87imck1t1g.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7s4h8uh.fsf@gnu.org> <87een81rkv.fsf@gnus.org> <83een8h575.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1r8xzbo.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40430"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 15803@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 14:48:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTk-000AOt-9C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:48:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45832 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTj-0008EA-92 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiRH-0005K1-NY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiRG-0002vI-DT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiRG-0006mL-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15803 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 15803-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15803.159982833826018 (code B ref 15803); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 12:45:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiQr-0006la-MP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:45:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33320) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiQq-0006lN-GG for 15803@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiQl-0002nw-5D; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2388 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiQc-0000Jf-N8; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:45:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r1r8xzbo.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:39:07 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187831 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 15803@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:39:07 +0200 > > So is this a problem with how ert calls the byte compiler after all? I don't think so, but I'm not sure. It could be some shenanigans of expand-file-name, for example: it has its own ideas for when to produce a unibyte string and when a multibyte string. Again, the fact that "foo 1" displays a unibyte undecoded file name sounds wrong to me. Is target-file also a unibyte Latin-1 string?