From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43519: 28.0.50; Overlay at end of minibuf hides minibuf's real content Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 12:03:41 +0300 Message-ID: <835z88251u.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43519@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 20 11:04:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvGU-0000IQ-BG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 11:04:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvGS-0002SA-SN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvGM-0002S2-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvGM-0008Kv-AI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvGM-00063t-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 09:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43519 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43519-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43519.160059263123284 (code B ref 43519); Sun, 20 Sep 2020 09:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43519) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2020 09:03:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48685 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvGB-00063U-Ka for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:03:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45698) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvG9-00063I-VU for 43519@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvG4-0008KE-Ax; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2917 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJvG2-0005SF-J8; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 05:03:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Sun, 20 Sep 2020 08:27:55 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188469 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 08:27:55 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: 43519@debbugs.gnu.org > > But the point is that there is clearly enough horizontal space, so there > is (or there does not seem to be) no reason to scroll horizontally. There's no horizontal scroll. What happens is that Emacs decides that the mini-window's display will start at EOB. I hope I've explained why this happens in my previous message. > > You are asking the display engine to do the impossible. > > No. With a minibuffer-only frame, the bug is not present. With a minibuffer-only frame, mini-window resizing works very differently: it resizes the entire frame. > So it's feasible, and the display engine knows how to do it. I'm sure we will welcome patches to make this happen in the other cases.