From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38072: when `byte-compile-file' finds out that a file is `no-byte-compile', it ignores `load' parameter Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 05:28:56 +0300 Message-ID: <835z86y26v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834kocrbg1.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2ldbug9.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5072"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 38072@debbugs.gnu.org, pogonyshev@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, akrl@sdf.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 04:30:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY4K-0001EG-BH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:30:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY4I-0001x0-Ur for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY4B-0001wf-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY4A-00050M-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY4A-0001i4-Px for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 02:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38072 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 38072-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38072.16007417436488 (code B ref 38072); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 02:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2020 02:29:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY3D-0001ga-5A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY3B-0001g6-3b for 38072@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY33-0004ts-Iq; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4519 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kKY32-000311-UK; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:28:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:30:30 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188655 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:30:30 +0000 > Cc: 38072@debbugs.gnu.org, pogonyshev@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > akrl@sdf.org > > > We cannot just remove it. We should document that it's deprecated and > > use advertised-calling-convention to advertise the signature without > > it (which will also produce a warning about using the argument in some > > situations). > > How about the attached patch? OK, but I'd prefer not to rename the argument itself, as that would get in the way of understanding the code. Thanks.