From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8355: 24.0.50; Boxes in mode-line and scrolling Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 19:13:12 +0200 Message-ID: <835z5a6gyf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k4fkr896.fsf@gmail.com> <871rg0ibj2.fsf@gnus.org> <87v9dcqojh.fsf@inria.fr> <83sg8g5fer.fsf@gnu.org> <878sa8b1bz.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8j45erv.fsf@gnu.org> <838sa754yt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7ouykuf.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1977"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: antoine.levitt@gmail.com, 8355@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 09 18:28:56 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3Gq-0000OA-EY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:28:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3Gp-0008HK-2n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:28:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn32Q-0001mG-K9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn32Q-00061y-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn32Q-0000sW-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8355 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 8355-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8355.16075340053324 (code B ref 8355); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8355) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2020 17:13:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn31o-0000rX-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn31m-0000rK-L3 for 8355@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:13:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn31h-0005kT-Fe; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:13:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4774 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kn31g-0006Hf-4S; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:13:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h7ouykuf.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:01:44 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195555 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: antoine.levitt@gmail.com, 8355@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:01:44 +0100 > > I tried this on something that has more dramatic line height > differences, and the phenomenon is more noticeable there -- when > scrolling downwards, things are very predictable, but when scrolling > backwards, Emacs seems to decide to scroll a couple of screenfuls when > there's large images in the buffer, and you have to C-v twice to get > back to where you were. > > Should I make a test case? Yes, please.