From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45428: 27.1; (quote (quote (quote ...))) unexpectedly works as anonymous face Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <835z4mkpvz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<>> <<<87eejc9pnm.fsf@gnus.org>>> <<>> <<<5e99c39b-b67b-4184-a890-2cae38fb40de@default>>> <<<87a6tzk5iv.fsf@metalevel.at>>> <<<83h7o7kufk.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<975c150b-99aa-4143-b057-8b5ec7caec19@default>> <<838s9jkqh7.fsf@gnu.org>> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36334"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, triska@metalevel.at, 45428@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 28 14:44:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsol-0009Mo-G9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 14:44:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsoj-0003dO-Pu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsoc-0003bi-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsob-00065m-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsob-0005KD-Jw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:44:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45428 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45428-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45428.160916301420426 (code B ref 45428); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2020 13:43:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34635 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsoA-0005JO-3M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ktso7-0005JA-Eh for 45428@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:43:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktso1-0005tn-2h; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:43:25 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1682 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsnz-0005JM-3W; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:43:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:56:39 -0800 (PST)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196867 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:56:39 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: triska@metalevel.at, drew.adams@oracle.com, larsi@gnus.org, > stefan@marxist.se, 45428@debbugs.gnu.org > > Or are you suggesting that the behavior was an accident? Yes! > what would be the argument for not fixing it That no one submitted a patch to reimplement that code in a way that won't allow such constructs.