From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:38:33 +0200 Message-ID: <835z2s9g5i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sg8zk4lj.fsf@precedence.co.uk> <87k0rzatbp.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mo85t6.fsf@gnus.org> <8735y7nk9z.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mlk5re.fsf@gnus.org> <8335y5l059.fsf@gnu.org> <837dngj6yp.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9ayhdn1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnvdvh1y.fsf@gnus.org> <96c6642f-8e2b-e77f-7b92-2fb57fd62d3d@yandex.ru> <520b0008-4e88-1509-bc78-607c7c5747cf@yandex.ru> <87sg5wxlm4.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38619"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: anticrisisg@gmail.com, 44834@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 16:39:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Rd-0009xp-Gj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:39:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Rc-0000qk-E2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:39:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2RK-0000pC-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2RK-0002Q1-3y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2RK-0002MZ-3F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44834.16134899229054 (code B ref 44834); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2021 15:38:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41279 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Qz-0002Lx-Va for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Qz-0002Ll-5X for 44834@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Qs-0002I9-Bi; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:38:35 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2652 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Qk-000640-On; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:38:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sg5wxlm4.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:06:43 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200128 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:06:43 +0100 > Cc: anticrisisg@gmail.com, 44834@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org > > So I think the text should go back to "15" unless Richard has a better > explanation for the change. Would it be good enough to say "about 10" instead? The exact number is impossible to define, and arguing about it is waste of time and energy. When in doubt (and we rarely are), we can always ask (and actually do ask).