From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46342: 28.0.50; socks-send-command munges IP address bytes to UTF-8 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:33:30 +0200 Message-ID: <835z2n13th.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875z355sh9.fsf@neverwas.me> <83pn1do008.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1lt2s8k.fsf@neverwas.me> <83czxdns61.fsf@gnu.org> <874kils22e.fsf@neverwas.me> <831rdpkyl6.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft24njud.fsf@neverwas.me> <83o8grj4d3.fsf@gnu.org> <87eehmlkhz.fsf@neverwas.me> <83o8gqhbeh.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7mh73zr.fsf@neverwas.me> <83blcpfhu7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1le4u6c.fsf@neverwas.me> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23415"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46342@debbugs.gnu.org To: "J.P." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 10:34:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOeW-0005xY-RO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 10:34:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41166 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOeV-0006UY-Dg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOeI-0006UP-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOeH-0006Gq-QO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:34:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOeH-0007Tq-M1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:34:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46342 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 46342-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46342.161381363528741 (code B ref 46342); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46342) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 09:33:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOeB-0007TV-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:33:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOe8-0007TI-KO for 46342@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:33:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOe2-0006B0-T5; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3919 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDOe1-0001O3-Vf; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:33:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r1le4u6c.fsf@neverwas.me> (jp@neverwas.me) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200410 Archived-At: > From: "J.P." > Cc: 46342@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 06:59:07 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So what is the problem with using unibyte-string for producing a > > unibyte string from a list of bytes? It sounds like it's exactly > > what is needed here, and is actually used in some places in socks.el. > > Great, thanks. That's what was needed indeed. I've updated things > accordingly and have added a doc string to socks-send-command explaining > the address parameter. Thanks. I wanted to install this, but it failed to apply to the master branch. Could you please rebase on the current master branch and resubmit?