From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46884: [PATCH] 27.1; Cannot run find-dired with -maxdepth Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:27:14 +0200 Message-ID: <835z26ysa5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k0qo699n.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft1c62hk.fsf@gnu.org> <80ft1bed4g.fsf@felesatra.moe> <87r1kv8dnt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <808s72e14s.fsf@felesatra.moe> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11743"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46884@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Allen Li Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 05 08:28:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4sc-0002ve-O3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 08:28:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35410 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4sb-00048K-Oj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:28:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4sU-00046n-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4sU-0000Z4-Ju for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4sU-0006Na-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 07:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46884 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46884-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46884.161492926024491 (code B ref 46884); Fri, 05 Mar 2021 07:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46884) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2021 07:27:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60887 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4s7-0006Mx-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4s6-0006Mj-74 for 46884@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:27:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4rz-0000Fr-Rv; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:27:31 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4254 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4rx-0001yM-1Y; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:27:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <808s72e14s.fsf@felesatra.moe> (message from Allen Li on Thu, 04 Mar 2021 19:21:39 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201500 Archived-At: > From: Allen Li > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 46884@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 19:21:39 -0800 > > For comparison: > > (find-dired DIR ARGS) > > I guess we could make ARGS optional and overload DIR to take a command? > What do you think, Eli? > > The new signature would look like: > > (find-dired DIR &optional ARGS CONFIRM) Sounds fine, I think, but could you post a more detailed proposal, or show a patch to that effect? Thanks.