From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48117: 28.0.50; Update of loaddefs.el during normal build is unreliable Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:54:04 +0300 Message-ID: <835z03bqv7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8335v8c7o0.fsf@gnu.org> <2weeer23xj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zgxf930u.fsf@igel.home> <838s4zbvyu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1ir9218.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34071"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 48117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 30 20:09:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXZo-0008gL-6S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:09:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56320 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXZn-00030L-8u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXLz-0001CC-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXLx-0006zr-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXLx-00068a-RS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48117.161980525923534 (code B ref 48117); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2021 17:54:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXLH-00067V-DK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:54:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXLG-00067K-CA for 48117@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:54:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXLA-0006bE-N4; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1920 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lcXL7-0004d4-Hd; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:54:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r1ir9218.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:21:07 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205290 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 48117@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:21:07 +0200 > > On Apr 30 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Judging by the results, that's not so. Specifically, > > batch-update-autoloads doesn't regenerate _all_ of the loaddefs.el, > > only some of its part(s). > > Yes, because it calls update-directory-autoloads for each directory. AFAIU, Glenn's proposal was to process all the directories.