From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48408: BUGFIX: window-default-font-height: check for nil string Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 07:22:24 +0300 Message-ID: <835yzjwbnj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210514011519.vsy5jbhyxd4v6kpt@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83mtsxzund.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516030618.7caj6icukblavhbp@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31852"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 16 06:23:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1li8J7-00085b-6V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 06:23:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60224 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li8J5-0003we-DF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li8Iw-0003wW-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li8Iw-0007Tz-Eb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1li8Iw-0003jC-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 04:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48408.162113895514285 (code B ref 48408); Sun, 16 May 2021 04:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 04:22:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49508 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1li8IV-0003iL-1t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:22:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60746) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1li8IT-0003i9-Sc for 48408@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:22:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li8IO-00079M-CH; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2789 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li8IK-0000vB-7M; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:22:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210516030618.7caj6icukblavhbp@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Sat, 15 May 2021 23:06:18 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206630 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 23:06:18 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: 48408@debbugs.gnu.org > > > M-: (frame-parameter nil 'display) RET > > ":0.0" That's the cause of the problem: it should say nil instead. Can you step through framep-on-display in that case and tell what does each of the expressions in 'or' there yield for that frame? That is, each one of these: (terminal-live-p ":0.0") (framep ":0.0") (frames-on-display-list ":0.0") My bet is that the 3rd one produces the bad result. Thanks.