From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49261: 28.0.50; File Locking Breaks Presumptuous Toolchains Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:16:59 +0300 Message-ID: <835yxvmio4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8bn7bie.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0mbmqkh.fsf@gnu.org> <87tulfxrn6.fsf@gmx.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32355"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, ncaprisunfan@gmail.com, 49261@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 30 18:36:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lydCF-0008DV-Il for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:36:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33616 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lydC9-0007h1-8V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lycub-0005kB-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lycuY-0007dB-7E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lycuX-0006l7-Qw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49261 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49261.162506984025929 (code B ref 49261); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2021 16:17:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lyctd-0006jp-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:17:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lyctb-0006jH-V6 for 49261@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lyctW-00071n-2T; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:16:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2127 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lyctV-0004QQ-Mh; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:16:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tulfxrn6.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:07:41 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209217 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , ncaprisunfan@gmail.com, > 49261@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:07:41 +0200 > > And there is the case of remote files. Do we want locking of remote > files? I think we do. maybe as an opt-in behavior? > Should the respective lock file be local (better for performance) or > also remote (better for locking a file being accessed from different > Emacsen somewhere)? Remote, I think, otherwise the lock can be easily ignored from another machine.