From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42424: 27.0.90; replace-match: point is NOT left at the end of replacement Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 17:20:16 +0300 Message-ID: <835ywqpntr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zh4ltc5l.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuussr1v.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuusj618.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1fefum7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1506"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42424@debbugs.gnu.org, victorhge@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 31 16:21:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9prS-000Aav-Mb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:21:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9prQ-0000uE-O6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9prK-0000u0-4O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9prJ-0003I5-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9prJ-0001bV-MQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42424 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 42424-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42424.16277412396128 (code B ref 42424); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42424) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2021 14:20:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9pqw-0001am-QX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:20:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9pqu-0001aa-Li for 42424@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:20:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9pqp-00035B-De; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:20:31 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2955 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9pqo-0008Ik-VB; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:20:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r1fefum7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:03:44 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210990 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 42424@debbugs.gnu.org, victorhge@gmail.com > Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:03:44 +0200 > > The hook is called from update_compositions, isn't it? Are there any > caveats to using that? No, the hooks are called from signal_after_change, AFAICT. And I'm probably missing something, because I don't understand how calling the hooks from replace-match would help: replace_range is called just once from replace-match, and the hooks are invoked at its very end. What am I missing?