From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50141: Current part of emacs red, other parts blue Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:36:52 +0300 Message-ID: <835yvyzzpn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tujjz612.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83pmu7z3zg.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf4v3qwu.fsf@gnus.org> <838s0vym9i.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilzz2ah2.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16840"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50141@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 21 15:38:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRCL-0004Bs-Gj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:38:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48798 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRCJ-0003Hc-HM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRCE-0003HF-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52778) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRCD-0002JR-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRCD-0008By-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50141 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50141-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50141.162955303431437 (code B ref 50141); Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50141) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2021 13:37:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRBS-0008Ay-L0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRBR-0008Ak-2M for 50141@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRBL-0001aK-EV; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1510 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRBL-0002Fs-06; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:37:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ilzz2ah2.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:28:25 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212351 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 50141@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:28:25 +0200 > > > Basically, faces were never designed to be window-specific. Even > > making them buffer-specific (via face-remapping-alist) is somewhat > > tricky. > > Yeah, I suspect we can't use faces here, but might have to add some new > window-specific background colour setting? What could that color setting be, except some face attribute?