From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:11:08 +0300 Message-ID: <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28128"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 16:12:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQyv-0006wb-C6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:12:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41720 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQyt-0005my-Gd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQyB-0005F0-3w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQyA-0004n1-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQyA-00023x-IX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.16305054927883 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 14:11:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxW-00022s-BJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxU-00022b-Rl; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxP-0004Dc-J7; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:15 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4824 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxN-0002xA-DW; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:55:29 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213193 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:55:29 +0200 > > If I filter out the `name' and `background-color' elements, then it > works. I can kinda see the first one, but... > > Hm... no, it's `background-color' in combination with something else; > just background-color works fine. > > I wonder whether this is points to a bug somewhere in the tty frame > mechanism... If the problem is background-color, why does redisplay complain about faces saying they are *invalid*? I could understand if it said it cannot load some color, but why "invalid face"? The only funky thing about background-color on TTY I can think of is the unspecified-bg thingy.