From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54646: 29.0.50; set-fontset-font and font clipping issues Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:42:42 +0300 Message-ID: <835ygulc59.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875ynuokqt.fsf@gmail.com> <83wnga5ap3.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6d69g46.fsf@gmail.com> <87h77dk3zn.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6d5jyat.fsf@gmail.com> <87wng989ym.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilrt5b1v.fsf@gnu.org> <87h77cetq9.fsf@gmail.com> <831qyg6cyt.fsf@gnu.org> <87czi0eoyx.fsf@gmail.com> <83wng84rf8.fsf@gnu.org> <874k3aede0.fsf@gmail.com> <83y20m32h2.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgl2cvj8.fsf@gmail.com> <83wng630fg.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8vqcthz.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnfitrqy.fsf@gmail.com> <83zgkdpoo2.fsf@gnu.org> <87pml9tmz4.fsf@gmail.com> <83r15ppf5b.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu8rs3uf.fsf@gmail.com> <87fsfybkoz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23089"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 54646@debbugs.gnu.org To: Visuwesh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 08 14:43:30 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9Av-0005rV-Hz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 14:43:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9Au-0000Eu-96 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:43:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9AV-0000Dd-33 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9AU-0007DU-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9AU-0001HP-Fb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 12:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54646 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54646-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54646.16652329694899 (code B ref 54646); Sat, 08 Oct 2022 12:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54646) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2022 12:42:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9AG-0001Gx-P8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9AE-0001Gj-DB for 54646@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:42:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9A9-000794-5R; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:42:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=3JWscZIO8WhSZehzN45Y5D9xpm/ROHPfskqEdjMKOPU=; b=ZHwH25O/n8UvolrBZ7hC xEXT8f0muIhHFlh9Fo0dxdN87BSAEqj8qihVBSWgiEONGzQ68Y33eiCi/ib1S1zCRwdgBdR0i2Ohd Mw7B0uv0kVMPfESKEdq7s+4lOnMgBKQPMOuiZYALfUeKjUYn8vFy5EIpRGG8KoGHRVSwt8yHDjRM7 cWu41fSkvwfL4/ahN9YE7c65Ewjjg9BIdp1Yj238M5k2wiJhkFpWgCgEZFBARXdk7MbRCvbUHr81o kunrCLfHqPtNKT19oi2SjxDN7KusQbYoFd6hnroYbZCXFhOcI+SnS8YSL+hhMHw5IPe2PV3iloHsZ DqGF1ypfxFx6Fg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3492 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh9A8-00044O-EQ; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:42:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fsfybkoz.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Visuwesh on Sat, 08 Oct 2022 17:18:12 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244892 Archived-At: > From: Visuwesh > Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 54646@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 17:18:12 +0530 > > [சனி ஜூன் 11, 2022] Visuwesh wrote: > > > [...] > > However, I have been using the xft+harfbuzz combo for a ~week now and I > > can say with confidence that I don't experience this strange issue. I > > would highly appreciate it if the decision to remove the xft backend > > could be delayed until a solution comes up [1]. Although the font > > rendering is worse, the text stays readable at all font sizes. > > I made some "progress" on this bug report. The misplacement goes away > when I close _all_ frames open on the Xorg display and open a fresh new > frame. If I only close the frame visiting the problematic buffer and > open a new frame to visit the buffer again, the misplacement does not go > away. > AFAIK, this workaround is not possible in "emacs -Q" since there is no > way to close all frames without also exiting Emacs. I tried to leave > the "original" frame around and opening a new frame but that did not > help. Could you please state what issue are you trying to discuss here? This bug report had its last communication 4 months ago, and its discussion thread is very long and includes several separate issues. It's hard to understand to which parts are you alluding here. If this is the original issue with incorrect advance width of the glyphs, then why is it interesting whether it goes away when you close all the frames? It will sooner or later appear again, and to solve the problem we need to understand what causes that, no?