From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33093: 26.1, 7.2 emacs-mac; M-x list-colors-display RET; L1 is black on black Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:02:48 +1100 Message-ID: <835CCBC3-A66A-4830-8663-8678C59E95A3@scratch.space> References: <294A9720-4C2B-4675-AE9B-2345F4EA5D2D@scratch.space> <83sh12p14i.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnw01u5c.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h8hahzhy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540504871 16156 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2018 22:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33093@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 00:01:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFngc-00041T-Ii for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:01:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFnii-0005MB-QM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:03:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFnic-0005Lv-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFniY-0004RC-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFniY-0004R6-FX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFniY-0002xv-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Van L Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33093 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 33093-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33093.154050498011389 (code B ref 33093); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33093) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2018 22:03:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFniW-0002xc-0u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:03:00 -0400 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:40395) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFniT-0002xR-MZ for 33093@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:02:58 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 14.203.214.4 Original-Received: from epi.local (14-203-214-4.tpgi.com.au [14.203.214.4]) (Authenticated sender: van@scratch.space) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7D8C20004; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:02:54 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87h8hahzhy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:151623 Archived-At: > When a sample text is not legible this warns the user against using = such > combination of foreground and background colors in user's = configuration, > i.e. it's easier for users to visually skip such hardly legible text > in the list when choosing a suitable color. It might be not worth the effort because it is near impossible to do, = but to imagine whiteclouds/bluesky, you could have the text always = legible where fore/background colors are too near for contrast and a = swatch-like solid cursor rectangle occupying the first position of the = line represents the actual foreground color. There you see the = fore/background colors are in fact indistinguishable. Just a wild idea.=