From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:02:27 +0300 Message-ID: <834o2evong.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bownv95b.fsf@gnu.org> <83aac7v4h3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311314594 20398 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2011 06:03:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org To: sds@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 22 08:03:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8pI-0001uX-Hv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:03:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8pI-0007NQ-1O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8pE-0007Mr-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8pC-0001YR-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8pC-0001YN-DX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8pB-0006pG-Uq; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9132 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9132-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9132.131131455226203 (code B ref 9132); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 06:02:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8oh-0006oa-DG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk8of-0006oO-IW for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOQ00D000RD6Q00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:02:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOQ00DTK0RY3M30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:02:23 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:03:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49546 Archived-At: > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:44:06 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 22:06:00 +0300]: > > > > You are welcome to add one, > > everyone scratches one's own itch, sorry. No need to be sorry. > I have never heard anyone claim that the strerror message should not be printed. I meant the text around what strerror returns.