From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:15:51 +0300 Message-ID: <834npv8fqg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> <83wr2u80i3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340907416 18803 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2012 18:16:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp, 11707@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 20:16:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJGw-0006Gv-Hv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:16:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJGw-0007ug-FS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJGt-0007ua-2t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJGr-00054d-Ec for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJGr-00054T-Ax for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:16:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJKw-00025w-3r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11707 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11707-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11707.13409076087986 (code B ref 11707); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 18:20:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJK3-00024l-Qb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:39859) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJK1-00024c-Fv for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M6C00D00AORGL00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:15:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M6C00D5RAPZGB10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:15:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61383 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:30:57 -0400 > > So would anyone object to my removing the "bzr-update" rule from > lisp/Makefile.in? Instead of removing it, and thus causing pain to finger memory of some of us, how about if bzr-update simply invokes whatever you think should be used instead?