From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13007: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:47:36 +0200 Message-ID: <834nkbx7if.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9FE4F131C0C94FC79470495A8506A387@us.oracle.com> <83k3t7xemd.fsf@gnu.org> <50B4EF28.6040905@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354038560 18233 80.91.229.3 (27 Nov 2012 17:49:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13007@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 27 18:49:32 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPHo-0006w8-9A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:49:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36523 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPHd-0005Ub-2l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:49:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPHV-0005U3-KU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:49:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPHU-0006kT-L2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPHU-0006kN-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:49:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPJF-0001Bq-Nb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13007 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13007-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13007.13540386084506 (code B ref 13007); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13007) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2012 17:50:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPIO-0001Ad-9X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42175) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdPIL-0001AU-0H for 13007@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ME500L00QM5FP00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 13007@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:47:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ME500KDEQQXH6M0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:47:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <50B4EF28.6040905@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67523 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:49:44 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > CC: Drew Adams , 13007@debbugs.gnu.org > > 1) is it meaningful to compare w->last_modified of minibuffer window with > MODIFF? I don't know. The old code did exactly that. > 2) is it possible to have an overlay in a minibuffer? Yes, definitely. E.g., icomplete-mode does that, AFAIR. > 3) should window_outdated_p be applicable to pseudowindows at all? I don't know. Do you want more crashes to be sure? ;-)