From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10304: 24.0.92: display bug Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:49:51 +0200 Message-ID: <834niw9cxs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762hihrj7.fsf@live.com> <8362gnhp9b.fsf@gnu.org> <8338yghv2a.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357379457 18025 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2013 09:50:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 05 10:51:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQPI-00089I-Gr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:51:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40665 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQP3-0001De-9U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQP0-0001DM-0Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:50:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQOw-00075Y-Lz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQOw-00075U-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:50:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQP7-0001b6-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 09:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10304 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10304-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10304.13573794136128 (code B ref 10304); Sat, 05 Jan 2013 09:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10304) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2013 09:50:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQOI-0001an-Qx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:45124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrQOD-0001ai-VT for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MG500B00CECMH00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:49:52 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MG500BI8CN4MU00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:49:52 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69405 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:17:51 +0100 > > By the way, perhaps the trace log should have timestamping on the lines > to be able to match it up more easily to user actions? What would you compare those time stamps with, to find out what trace corresponds to which user action?