From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14170: 24.3; linum won't create all overlays after a folding Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:52:22 +0300 Message-ID: <834nfbap2x.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365771206 8019 80.91.229.3 (12 Apr 2013 12:53:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14170@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 12 14:53:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdTr-00049p-Pt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:53:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43582 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdTr-0002xa-EH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdTm-0002xI-VJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:53:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdTl-0006Va-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdTl-0006VW-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdXW-0001XN-Nx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:57:15 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:57:13 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14170 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14170-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14170.13657713965386 (code B ref 14170); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:57:13 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2013 12:56:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47067 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdWn-0001Nl-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:43645) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UQdWb-0001L8-Hi for 14170@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:56:22 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ML50020072NLL00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14170@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:52:21 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ML5002347R8KU40@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:52:21 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73358 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:51:59 -0400 > > E Sabof wrote: > > > nlinum works correctly. > > This is the answer to most recent bug reports involving linum, as I > recall. Will nlinum replace linum at some point? Btw, if nlinum is our response to the problems in linum, then nlinum should be a bit more friendly to bidirectional text, and determine whether to put numbers on the left or right margin by looking at what current-bidi-paragraph-direction returns. (Yes, this means that if some paragraphs are L2R and others R2L, some numbers will be on the left, while others on the right.)