From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16504: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:13:32 +0200 Message-ID: <834n4yii03.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838uuaipkm.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390245312 21534 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2014 19:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16504@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 20 20:15:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KJZ-00035g-Uq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:15:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54217 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KJZ-0007mA-G4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:15:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KJS-0007lN-7A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:15:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KJK-0007Yt-P9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KJK-0007Y9-FV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KJK-00054j-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16504 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16504-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16504.139024527319454 (code B ref 16504); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2014 19:14:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58713 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KIr-00053h-00 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:14:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:42162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5KIo-00053O-0G for 16504@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:14:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZP00900QMDXJ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16504@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:13:24 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZP00ABFS2B7G00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:13:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83812 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:33:29 +0100 > Cc: Drew Adams , 16504@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > it's just that it doesn't have a bold variant, which is needed to > > display the buffer name on the mode line. > > Shouldn't Emacs in that case select another font? I don't know, sorry. Fontsets and font selection were always a kind of voodoo to me.