From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:48:35 +0200 Message-ID: <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391849410 4134 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 08:50:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 09:50:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3c8-0004q0-8I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45674 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3c7-0003aU-Ue for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39189) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3c0-0003Yl-F3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3bu-0001qQ-M8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3bu-0001q3-IS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3bu-0007LY-7z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139184934328154 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 08:49:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3at-0007Jg-Ev for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:57902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3ao-0007JR-9E for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:48:58 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0O001005R4FY00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:47:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0O00O3D5RE9X20@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:47:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84916 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:08:00 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > My reading of this is: Emacs was at the end of a redisplay cycle, when > > a call to an X function signaled an error because "Connection lost to > > X server `:0'". Then Emacs tried to delete the frame on that display, > > which again involves calls to X. > > > > Do you know why the connection was lost in the first place? > > As far as I can tell, no X connection was lost. Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is very clear.