From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21077: 24.5; Slow printing in inferior python buffer with python-shell-enable-font-lock Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:34:33 +0300 Message-ID: <834ml37v7a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83615k6jf7.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1437075322 6674 80.91.229.3 (16 Jul 2015 19:35:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21077@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ista Zahn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 16 21:35:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFow2-0007KB-KV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:35:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41661 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFow1-00085h-Ro for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38699) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFovy-00084Y-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFovu-0005F7-OE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFovu-0005Et-Ko for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFovu-0004bO-4u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21077 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21077-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21077.143707528217663 (code B ref 21077); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2015 19:34:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51430 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFovZ-0004an-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:34:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:35896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFovV-0004aY-Bv for 21077@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NRL00000HXL1O00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 21077@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:34:31 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NRL00MIKIDCYB80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:34:31 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104998 Archived-At: > From: Ista Zahn > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:09:19 -0400 > Cc: 21077@debbugs.gnu.org > > Either way this is not good. Clearly there is something wrong here. > Nitpicking about whether it requires killing emacs or not doesn't seem > helpful to me. I thought I was doing fine by providing additional details about the problem. Now I'm beginning to think I maybe should have kept my mouth shut.