From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21953: Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:38:05 +0200 Message-ID: <834mgj9h76.fsf@gnu.org> References: <564CC5E6.10303@cornell.edu> <838u5v9m3x.fsf@gnu.org> <564CCF49.1030804@cornell.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447879161 12305 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2015 20:39:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, 21953@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 21:39:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9VW-0006C2-7n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:39:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9VV-0001Oa-LU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9VS-0001Nm-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9VO-0005BI-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:39:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9VO-0005BE-1b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9VN-0006Yb-SF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21953.144787911525160 (code B ref 21953); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2015 20:38:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9Ux-0006Xj-2T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:38:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:57191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9Uc-0006XG-KP for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:38:33 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NY100B0028ZAO00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:37:32 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NY1001O12MKK590@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:37:32 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <564CCF49.1030804@cornell.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108885 Archived-At: > Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, 21953@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Ken Brown > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:19:37 -0500 > > > However, if you test for cygwin-convert-file-name-from-windows being > > bound, do you still need the test for Cygwin in addition to that? > > No, I've now removed it. Thanks. Thank you.