From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22114: 24.5; [PATCH] Allow profiler.el to display reports after stopping Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:38:30 +0200 Message-ID: <834mfsdend.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bna0di5k.fsf@gnu.org> <20151208164049.GB1080@odonien.bevuta.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449596359 13367 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2015 17:39:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22114@debbugs.gnu.org To: Vasilij Schneidermann Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 18:39:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MEH-0006zo-KL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:39:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MEH-0005Z9-1F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MED-0005Z3-QT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:39:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MEA-0003Qo-CN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MEA-0003QV-9X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6ME9-0000OE-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22114 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 22114-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22114.14495963351482 (code B ref 22114); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22114) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2015 17:38:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6ME2-0000Nq-Jf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:38:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:55771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MDh-0000NA-Es for 22114@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:38:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ100M00V2WMF00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 22114@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:33:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ100LQJVG66420@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:33:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20151208164049.GB1080@odonien.bevuta.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109772 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:40:49 +0100 > From: Vasilij Schneidermann > Cc: 22114@debbugs.gnu.org > > Or imposing a restriction on the profiler workflow such as that it must > be running to produce a profiler report... Sorry, I don't understand this comment. If the report can be produced when the profiler is stopped, then the limitation is lifted, right?