From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22338: 25.0.50; deactivate-mark regression Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 21:08:57 +0200 Message-ID: <834mds1c52.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8337tyextd.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4bi9ap3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454353838 20934 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2016 19:10:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22338@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 01 20:10:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJrX-00088s-Mh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:10:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJrX-000147-0B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:10:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJrT-000130-8n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJrO-0001Ji-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57251) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJrO-0001Je-3o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJrO-0003gv-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22338 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22338-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22338.145435377014144 (code B ref 22338); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2016 19:09:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJqs-0003g3-3G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJqr-0003fs-4O for 22338@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:09:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJqi-0001Dw-VK for 22338@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJqi-0001Ds-Ry; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:09:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1333 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aQJqi-0001Rs-5S; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:09:20 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Leo Liu on Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:02:08 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112221 Archived-At: > From: Leo Liu > Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:02:08 +0800 > > I am now using GNU Emacs 25.0.90 built on 2016-01-31 and the problem > seems getting better. My current observation is this (revert-buffer nil > t t) only keeps the active mark if the file has not changed at all but > deactivates it otherwise. I modified the file by appending a line to it > using shell command. This is exactly what I did, and your observations now match mine. Do you still think the mark should be deactivated in that single case, or can we conclude that the problem is no longer significant and close this bug? Thanks.