From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014). Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:55:33 +0200 Message-ID: <834m35dv5m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <559F9FAF.8090708@live.com> <83egkgb2wo.fsf@gnu.org> <559FF8F6.2060209@live.com> <55A652E4.5000606@yandex.ru> <56D7D5D3.4030103@live.com> <56D7DCC6.9060003@live.com> <56D7E2F6.2020008@live.com> <56D7E8D6.6080508@live.com> <831t7r1f41.fsf@gnu.org> <5ce0aa39-8a49-5cfd-2eac-343fae4505a1@live.com> <83fur3ysvk.fsf@gnu.org> <83dde388-a342-ed1e-1242-7953d9a0f525@gmail.com> <83lgx9ua9x.fsf@gnu.org> <389383ed-ce95-a558-e441-ba7cfa58d58e@gmail.com> <83bmy5u6qo.fsf@gnu.org> <2fd3e21c-37b9-d559-6306-4e8adebad3d5@gmail.com> <831sz0sfug.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479459375 12020 195.159.176.226 (18 Nov 2016 08:56:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21028@debbugs.gnu.org To: clement.pit@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 18 09:56:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exv-0002Nq-1q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:56:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exy-0000SC-AW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exp-0000Qy-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exm-0003oF-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exm-0003o5-KC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exm-0001MP-BF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21028 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21028-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21028.14794593405199 (code B ref 21028); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21028) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2016 08:55:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exQ-0001Ln-C3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exP-0001Lc-BF for 21028@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:55:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exG-0003jh-Sc for 21028@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:55:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exG-0003jb-P6; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:55:30 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2303 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c7exF-0005Je-QJ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:55:30 -0500 In-reply-to: <831sz0sfug.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:33:43 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125819 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:33:43 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 21028@debbugs.gnu.org > > Thanks. So, like I said: let's revisit this in a month or two, > assuming no other problems surface. Given my latest discoveries related to bug#24953, one other thing I'd suggest to try, with an unpatched build from the current emacs-25 branch, is, instead of this: (set-fontset-font t 'unicode (font-spec :name "Arial") nil 'append) to use this: (set-fontset-font t 'unicode (font-spec :family "Arial" :registry "iso10646-1") nil 'append) IOW, explicitly tell that the font's registry is iso10646-1. Does this per chance resolve the performance problem?