From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6072: 24.0.50; Problems with M-x gdb on MS-Windows Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:40:35 +0300 Message-ID: <834kzyxfjw.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="23787"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 6072-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 24 19:24:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgqL-00060s-Gc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:24:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48654 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgqI-0000s4-C9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAb-0006Xr-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAZ-0005qr-TA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAY-0005qW-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAY-00062d-Nz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:41:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 6072 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 6072@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 6072-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D6072.157193526123205 (code D ref 6072); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6072-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2019 16:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36858 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAW-00062B-VG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:41:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51633) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAU-00061v-Ji for 6072-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:40:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAO-0005my-Fv; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:40:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2247 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iNgAN-0001UM-Fb; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:40:52 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:32:03 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170139 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:32:03 +0200 > Cc: 6072@debbugs.gnu.org > > Below is a 9 year old bug report of yours, which never got a reply at the time. > > A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then, so: is this > still an issue? No, all of those problems have been fixed. So I'm closing the bug report; thanks for digging it from under the dust.