From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38044: 27.0.50; There should be an easier way to look at a specific vc commit Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 14:13:44 +0200 Message-ID: <834kyuvlhj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ftj5at1q.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltslnpo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d0dvmqu8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <590e595e-8220-1c7e-bd4a-b2eb0968e289@yandex.ru> <87r226xl8m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <24c56bca-8d7d-3a20-aeef-5d11f8a075e6@yandex.ru> <87pnhquo4k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6087186e-a444-0aac-e87d-596d2e36f0ce@yandex.ru> <877e3wub09.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5ce7d4f0-3884-fd27-09dc-c38f01a19958@yandex.ru> <83zhgr26c3.fsf@gnu.org> <87blt7qxhz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837e3v1aae.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2warzv3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r221xoll.fsf@gnu.org> <83a78pxenu.fsf@gnu.org> <215302ff-8252-1f6c-5f60-aaba01cd615f@yandex.ru> <837e3tx9s8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnhl9biu.fsf@gmx.net> <8336egxtja.fsf@gnu.org> <87h82wmfes.fsf@gmx.net> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="101636"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, 38044@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 23 13:15:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUJl-000QHV-QU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 13:15:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58414 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUJj-0003ML-U7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUJd-0003M0-VP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUJd-0000tk-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUJc-0000tg-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUJZ-0003Nc-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:15:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38044 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38044.157451129112959 (code B ref 38044); Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2019 12:14:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55883 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUJ7-0003Mg-U5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:14:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUIV-0003LV-2Q for 38044@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:13:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUIO-0000cJ-V5; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:13:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4375 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iYUIO-0002wQ-4y; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:13:48 -0500 In-reply-to: <87h82wmfes.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:25:15 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172283 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, juri@linkov.net, larsi@gnus.org, 38044@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:25:15 +0100 > > I find even just typing one C-u less convenient, hence my suggestion > below, which I'm glad you find worth considering. > > >> Since one of the desiderata of this command, perhaps even the main > >> one, is that it should act on the revision ID at point, how about > >> making just `C-x v L' do that if it recognizes the word at point as > >> a revision ID? > > > > We could do that, yes. > > > >> If this is deemed to unreliable, it could be conditioned by a user > >> option, or perhaps (though more annoying) by asking for > >> confirmation. > > > > Fine with me, assuming the rest of the proposal is accepted. Btw, in the above scenario, I guess it would be more convenient if the revision was displayed in "the other" window, so that the user could continue reading/studying whatever he/she was looking at before invoking the command, is that right?