From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46494: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Problems with async background compile Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:37:50 +0200 Message-ID: <834ki6zlld.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52dad420-fd72-fe1c-6f74-f4c114a2deb8@gmail.com> <83sg5ybr95.fsf@gnu.org> <834ki710ug.fsf@gnu.org> <868s7jym8t.fsf@gmail.com> <83wnv2zypz.fsf@gnu.org> <864ki68zg9.fsf@gmail.com> <83a6ryznlj.fsf@gnu.org> <86y2fi7ikf.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22275"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46494@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 18:39:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWEA-0005g0-Bw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:39:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49504 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWE9-0001RB-Dd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWDf-0001AP-Iz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41221) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWDe-0003LB-JR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWDe-0007Zp-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46494 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46494-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46494.161384269429067 (code B ref 46494); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46494) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 17:38:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52767 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWCr-0007Yk-SL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:38:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWCq-0007YY-Db for 46494@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:38:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48117) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWCl-0002xA-6K; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3116 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDWCk-0008I8-Ch; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:38:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86y2fi7ikf.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Andy Moreton on Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:30:40 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200452 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:30:40 +0000 > > > Great, thanks for trying this. So at the very least we have a > > workaround, if not the solution. > > Yes. It also seemed faster, in that I had to be quicker at entering > process IDs to send a single before the subprocess exited normally. Maybe because when w32-start-process-share-console is nil, we tell CreateProcess to create a new console for the sub-process, and that takes more time for the OS.