From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46709: 28.0.50; Emacs crash in gnutls_handshake Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:20:20 +0200 Message-ID: <834ki0rouz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czwsc5mz.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6rt76ch.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8g95r72.fsf@gmail.com> <87k0qx5nqe.fsf@gmail.com> <87pn0o41re.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8g8t9pf.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 46709@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 19:21:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLGB-0001uG-UO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:21:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLGA-00089f-TM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:21:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLG2-00086M-EQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLG2-0000d8-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLG2-00071A-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46709 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 46709-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46709.161427724126926 (code B ref 46709); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46709) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 18:20:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLFh-00070E-Fr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:20:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46158) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLFg-000703-WF for 46709@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:20:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLFb-0000QS-Nh; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:20:35 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2707 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lFLFb-0007L3-3k; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:20:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87o8g8t9pf.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:04:44 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200805 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:04:44 +0100 > Cc: 46709@debbugs.gnu.org > > Eli, you might want to cherry-pick that to emacs-27, but Iʼve not > tested it there. Thanks, but I'd rather not put there anything that isn't well tested.