From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:14:32 +0200 Message-ID: <834khlsmnb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86eehujcip.fsf@gmail.com> <86blch14qt.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7m84h9g.fsf@gnu.org> <86v9ao5czu.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnutogrh.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnut8fb9.fsf@gmail.com> <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83pn0km6y3.fsf@gnu.org> <86ft1f8ara.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x6u9o4.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzesrku.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kpsrng.fsf@gnu.org> <83blbtso9k.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34323"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, akrl@sdf.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 08 16:16:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHcJ-0008m9-5R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 16:16:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43048 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHcI-0001Ax-6R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:16:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHb4-0000ft-Pv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHb4-0004nd-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHb4-0004q1-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 15:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.161521648418554 (code B ref 46256); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 15:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2021 15:14:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHam-0004pC-Ha for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:14:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHal-0004ox-Nx for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:14:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHag-0004ad-DD; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2456 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHaf-0000ER-QS; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:14:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:50:50 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201843 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:50:50 +0000 > Cc: Andrea Corallo , 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com > > > > No dlclose() on Windows. > > > > Why does this matter in this case? (And I do have dlclose in a > > standard library that comes with MinGW, btw. Not that it's relevant.) > > We don't use dlclose() on Windows. FreeLibrary() is documented not to > unload the library in certain cases, and to return a failure code. You will need to show how those cases could happen in our scenario, given the way we call FreeLibrary and other related APIs. Otherwise, I don't see how these subtleties are relevant. > > > FreeLibrary() is documented to behave differently from dlclose() > > > > It is? In what way? > > Libraries can be pinned We never call the API that could result in a library being pinned, certainly not in the scenario we are talking about. At least that's my reading of the code. Again, if you can describe the situation where such pinning could happen, please do. If that happens, it's probably a bug, because we have no reason to pin a DLL. > > Well, how about explaining the details in terms that are simple enough > > that I could understand and do the testing? > > Excellent idea. I'll try! Thanks, I will study this later.