From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Ioannis Kappas <ioannis.kappas@gmail.com>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 48137@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48137: 27.2; `package-install-file' fails when loading a package file with DOS line endings
Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 15:15:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <834kfmabvs.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRHuGDMxW4QmpaO=1VWPKxH_J_KKqHAfUezeY=_WSPi5cm_Rw@mail.gmail.com> (message from Ioannis Kappas on Sat, 1 May 2021 12:48:06 +0100)
> From: Ioannis Kappas <ioannis.kappas@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 12:48:06 +0100
>
> The error appears to be a side effect of `package-install-file'
> loading the file literally with `insert-file-contents-literally' and
> thus setting the coding system to 'no-conversion (as reported by the
> `buffer-file-coding-system' variable ). This means that for a DOS
> encoded file the ?\r (Carriage Return) in the DOS line ending ?\r?\n
> will be treated as an independent control character rather than
> consumed as part of the line ending as far as Emacs is concerned.
>
> This extra control character in our case appears in the version number
> extracted with `lm-header' (.e.g. "0.1^M"), failing the
> `version-to-list' conversion in
> `package-buffer-info'->`package-strip-rcs-id', resulting to the error
> that it lacks a version header.
>
> It is not obvious why `package-install-file' loads package files
> literally at all times, `package--with-response-buffer-1' also does
> the same. If the reason turns out not to be important, then a possible
> solution could be to load package files metaphorically:
>
> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el
> index ecb2573cab..98d63f1aff 100644
> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el
> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el
> @@ -2147,8 +2147,11 @@ package-install-file
> (progn
> (setq default-directory file)
> (dired-mode))
> - (insert-file-contents-literally file)
> - (when (string-match "\\.tar\\'" file) (tar-mode)))
> + (if (string-match "\\.tar\\'" file)
> + (progn
> + (insert-file-contents-literally file)
> + (tar-mode))
> + (insert-file-contents file)))
I don't think this is TRT, because insert-file-contents also decodes
the character encoding, not just the EOL encoding.
> Another solution could be to upgrade the 'lisp-mnt package to ignore
> ?\r characters. Looking at the `lm-header' fn invoked by
> `package-buffer-info', it does have a list of characters to stop at
> when looking for a header, we can thus add the carriage return to the
> list:
>
> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el
> index 9cba232e16..3eb493d286 100644
> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el
> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ lm-header
> (if (save-excursion
> (skip-chars-backward "^$" (match-beginning 0))
> (= (point) (match-beginning 0)))
> - "[^\n]+" "[^$\n]+")))
> + "[^\n\r]+" "[^$\n\r]+")))
This is better, but IMO the code should be rewritten not to allow a
lone CR character, only either a lone LF or the CRLF pair.
> Or is it perhaps that packages should only be written with Unix line
> endings and thus the solution is to update documentation and create
> more targeted error messages?
This is probably the best, IMO. Stefan?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-01 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-01 11:38 bug#48137: 27.2; `package-install-file' fails when loading a package file with DOS line endings Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-01 11:48 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-01 12:15 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-05-01 13:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-05-03 17:47 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-03 18:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-05-03 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-03 18:49 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-03 18:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-03 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-05-04 11:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-03 19:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-05-04 11:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-04 15:57 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-04 16:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-04 16:27 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-04 16:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-05 7:03 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-05 12:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <CAMRHuGAi9+q-MKRGPxLqxdP_7SSF4Nqj+JuSsZigviAQs_d7Rw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-05-06 6:55 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-06 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-06 13:27 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-06 15:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-11 6:52 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-11 12:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-15 13:52 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-16 9:09 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-05-29 8:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-29 13:59 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-29 14:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-06 9:11 ` Ioannis Kappas
2021-07-20 13:54 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=834kfmabvs.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=48137@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ioannis.kappas@gmail.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).