From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48117: 28.0.50; Update of loaddefs.el during normal build is unreliable Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 10:41:01 +0300 Message-ID: <834kfl8twy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8335v8c7o0.fsf@gnu.org> <2weeer23xj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83im43bwod.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1ipk323.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30961"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 48117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 02 09:42:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6kB-0007xU-Oe for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:42:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6kA-0004zB-Re for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:42:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6jq-0004qC-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6jq-0008Cx-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6jq-0001MB-I3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 07:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48117.16199412905174 (code B ref 48117); Sun, 02 May 2021 07:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 07:41:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6jJ-0001LO-ME for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:41:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6jI-0001LI-5D for 48117@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6jC-0007qb-Q8; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3839 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6jB-0008Kg-JF; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:41:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r1ipk323.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 02 May 2021 09:28:04 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205391 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Glenn Morris , 48117@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 09:28:04 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> 1) autoload generation is slow. > > > > Based on my latest experience, I think this is somewhat exaggerated, > > especially given that our builds became slower lately. > > Has it? I haven't noticed any substantial slow-down... (Unless you > mean with native-comp switched on.) Yes, native-comp, certainly. But the build became slower a year or so ago as well, I no longer remember why. > In any case, autoload generation takes a substantial chunk of time -- > especially since it's single-threaded. Glenn's suggestion to copy over > ldefs-boot.el (if it's newer) sounds like a good idea to me. Yes, I agree.