From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48408: BUGFIX: window-default-font-height: check for nil string Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 13:45:18 +0300 Message-ID: <834kf5zj9d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210514011519.vsy5jbhyxd4v6kpt@E15-2016.optimum.net> <139ea227-861b-b3c3-c36a-9b7ac30a5acb@gmx.at> <83bl9dzsg5.fsf@gnu.org> <25ac01b7-c6ef-3554-60d0-25ddead80495@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: boruch_baum@gmx.com, 48408@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 14 12:46:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVKb-0007De-EO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:46:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVKa-0004ar-B8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVKT-0004Zl-Va for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVKT-0006M9-OV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVKT-0007Kp-N9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48408.162098911825670 (code B ref 48408); Fri, 14 May 2021 10:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 10:45:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45160 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVJl-0006fX-Ey for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVJh-0006Vo-Ah for 48408@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVJb-0005fH-L8; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2891 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhVJa-0005V1-GE; Fri, 14 May 2021 06:45:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <25ac01b7-c6ef-3554-60d0-25ddead80495@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Fri, 14 May 2021 10:15:58 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206510 Archived-At: > Cc: boruch_baum@gmx.com, 48408@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:15:58 +0200 > > >> Sorry. This function is missing from my current window.el here ... > > > > Really? It is still there on today's master. So I wonder what kind > > of revolution do you have waiting in the wings... > > Nothing special. Just a function that takes its buffer's face remapping > into account. But it lacks an alias and is apparently just as broken as > the old one, see below. Yes, the same problem should affect this version as well, since it still assumes (correctly) that if the frame supports fonts, the default font's name is a string.