From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48654: Overfull hbox, Unicode code points style (display.texi) Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 11:24:14 +0300 Message-ID: <834kem6j81.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1b291257-516b-e751-1a7b-79823964ad16@gmail.com> <83lf82bufx.fsf@gnu.org> <5db3ff2d-1c26-35cb-084a-0ef3d48928a6@gmail.com> <83wnrlacw4.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16352"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48654@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Urban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 10:25:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuHO-00045t-G2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:25:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuHN-0000jF-J7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuHG-0000iz-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuHF-0003Wr-RE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuHF-0006pM-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 08:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48654 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48654-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48654.162227665126172 (code B ref 48654); Sat, 29 May 2021 08:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48654) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2021 08:24:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55957 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuGR-0006o3-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuGQ-0006np-8o for 48654@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuGL-0002l2-3A; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4656 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmuGK-0002o0-MC; Sat, 29 May 2021 04:24:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Sebastian Urban on Wed, 26 May 2021 21:00:47 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207519 Archived-At: > From: Sebastian Urban > Cc: 48654@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 21:00:47 +0200 > > >>> Also, why remove @code{..} from the "U+NNNN" notation -- what does > >>> that solve? > >> Because, ~2 years ago you decided to follow Unicode docs notation, > >> and I'm just fixing the leftovers. See your commit: > >> (...)/emacs.git/commit/?id=f68b33f50299339a36da29cd1913d19fd5f288e0 > > OK, that just emphasizes the importance of providing the commit log > > message with reasoning when you propose a patch, TIA. > > There were various styles of Unicode code points and character names > across Emacs manual ~2 years ago. It was decided to follow Unicode > notation, so I'm following it. Then, the reason is... consistency? > > Perhaps you could use the same messages: > Fix styling of Unicode codepoints in manuals > OR > Canonicalize the style of "U+NNNN CHARACTER NAME". > > >> I don't know if it's a good idea to keep this just in case someone > >> changes the text in the future, or makes PDF using A5 page format. > >> Currently (official PDF), it's not close to a line break. > > What's the harm? > > None? But... > > >> (...) if it stays, I suggest moving it to DOCSTYLE.TEXI, (...) > > Fine with me. > > ...since you agreed with moving it to DOCSTYLE.TEXI, let it be the > solution. Thanks, could you please post an updated patch with all of the above taken care of?