From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10107: 23.2; Add command gud-quit Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:59:15 +0300 Message-ID: <834kebi1y4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762icpcus.fsf@linux-4qi7.site> <1706399.zsAvlgfHB3@localhost.localdomain> <87k0n7uzcz.fsf@gnus.org> <2011306.fv05nxKMY0@localhost.localdomain> <87lf7nqhrk.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28328"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 10107@debbugs.gnu.org, giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 06 15:00:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsOK-00077M-H0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:00:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60328 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsOJ-00037L-0d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsNo-00036a-1K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsNn-0005Pq-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsNn-0005US-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:00:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10107.162298436821032 (code B ref 10107); Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2021 12:59:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsNE-0005TA-GI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 08:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsNC-0005Sw-QG for 10107@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 08:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsN3-0004xG-Qn; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 08:59:17 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2322 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsN3-00025G-DO; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 08:59:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lf7nqhrk.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:50:23 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208124 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:50:23 +0200 > Cc: 10107@debbugs.gnu.org > > Oh, I see -- you just want a command that kills the process in the > current buffer? > > Sure, that's something that I think sounds generally useful (for > instance to kill an out-of-control process that's inserting something in > the buffer), and there doesn't seem to be such a command? > > The `delete-process' function does this (with no parameters it'll kill > the process in the current buffer), so we could just slap an interactive > spec on it and make it a command. (Assigning a keystroke to it might > perhaps be overkill.) Why not invoke kill-process instead?