From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59094: 29.0.50; ediff-revision flags wrong lines in etc/HELLO Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 18:49:22 +0200 Message-ID: <834jvazp4d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5768.1667836176@alto> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 59094@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mike Kupfer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 07 17:50:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1os5KV-0006rb-Ti for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 17:50:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os5KF-0001s7-NL; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os5K4-0001r6-0l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os5Jy-0003ls-Ck for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:50:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1os5Jy-0007iR-0c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59094-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59094.166783978829631 (code B ref 59094); Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2022 16:49:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35209 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1os5Jj-0007hr-PH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:49:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1os5Jf-0007hb-6J for 59094@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os5JZ-0003Gv-Ii; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:49:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=df+dAZVfGrtsmD+rLDydeUbcYTh8I2ybZAKT1ZhPMcI=; b=D3M3deW7vqh0 GBBjLx+u2xsSeUzSNhGYKTi9erCL4TUgs8GgwFM8ERP4sPPnK3KTS49blCrj1NFVP1kX5wJq1mAz2 OsNTAxm6Y7ybrxf4gTkEMQ7Y+fp4hZv4S213adj/bDl4bfeubAWHgTvtCScEA9lG7MrSdLDALeIsT jtogSSnTeBYObuH1nP30uYmbZdbucGc9qE1mbs+OWJtvIueXzd6Q+6df1aygv54jKXBbQrO6ne9tU Pb1O+kGHqsc0SItLwxGt30KUVsvWploPfdIBPTMcBZr5jzQA+ellIYbp1g86mV34UBYjueINtAayC EUrYibwAS9ezHKExT7TNBw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os5JY-0006N1-Ov; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:49:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5768.1667836176@alto> (message from Mike Kupfer on Mon, 07 Nov 2022 07:49:36 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:247288 Archived-At: > From: Mike Kupfer > cc: 59094@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 07:49:36 -0800 > > Are the charset tags (annotations) really necessary, given the setting > of 'coding' in the local variables? Yes, they help Emacs choose suitable fonts where the same characters should use different fonts depending on the character set. > The reason I ask is that the files that I saved last night from the old > and new Ediff buffers can be reloaded, and Ediff is able to correctly > show the changes. Yet I don't see any visual distinctions between the > new file and etc/HELLO, even though the new file's mode is just > Fundamental, not Fundamental Enriched. (Even the orange text on lines 1 > and 34 is duplicated in the saved file, which I confess puzzles me.) The effect of the charsets is really relevant to CJK cultures, and even that is nowadays less important than 20 years ago.