From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65250: 30.0.50; "C-h f" is much slower on the master branch Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:11:42 +0300 Message-ID: <834jl1bqvl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838ragdzw5.fsf@gnu.org> <83cyzpbyuz.fsf@gnu.org> <835y5hbsc2.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23037"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 65250@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 14 17:12:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZEr-0005qd-R0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:12:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZEk-0004v9-3G; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZEg-0004uo-OC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZEg-0008KY-Fz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZEg-000871-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 15:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65250 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65250-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65250.169202590931163 (code B ref 65250); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 15:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65250) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2023 15:11:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34180 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZES-00086Z-W1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZER-00086N-Bx for 65250@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qVZEL-0008IV-U5 for 65250@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:11:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Q850clcvhaw/MPmx9aDm3tLiiDBxSiJpLcXUV002WrI=; b=SwD+2mpFYoR1 uhKzNSsNPxmdyOVffRW8S9QFA301kYAVg+20dukuYEeUtw7XYETdqeuZR04B44dcYNZLjbc6thLBN aJJzY4Sa/V1GwGpZbWonH2zDafZdLAid4WcHkZ3h6aVWxW5fbYWJ3DyOJZCZ0hE//vLRb9jF2KCmq v6PD0BVEooazB9ef2VxS3O3agsK50D9pl1OKnei9DWmRn/tjGUHyQjvgF8haaN1lqevJDCfzUKQAQ i7ovKZIlx5xqnR0thx6llkOT/Tnwru0FDyWg4owHvuG25/yJMIkbTXBMnCtbvr6nGZY8fRERosdYw FJhV1yJ5v8BLAYn/zmC/rg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:51:46 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:267427 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: 65250@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:51:46 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So I think the patch I presented in my original report is exactly what > > is needed here: the problem only happens in builds without > > native-compilation, and in that case there's no reason whatsoever to > > call comp-function-type-spec. (And builds from a release tarball will > > not see that problem, since the tarball comes with byte-compiled > > comp.el and comp-cstr.el.) > > > > Do you agree? > > I certainly do. Thanks for the anylysis and the patch! Installed. Btw, why aren't comp.el and comp-cstr.el byte-compiled in a build without native-compilation? That's probably a bug in itself: we generally byte-compile all the *.el files, even those that are not relevant to the configuration being built.