From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8307: Scrolling problems in lexbind-new branch Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:49:14 +0200 Message-ID: <8339matj7p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r59z7yqo.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301126865 25405 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2011 08:07:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8307@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 26 09:07:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3OX5-0003t2-4m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:07:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3OX3-0008Fe-EQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33846 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3OWe-0008FP-7D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3OWZ-0006CM-KV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3OWZ-0006CE-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:07:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3OG3-0003Ih-7N; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:50:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 07:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8307 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8307-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8307.130112576112627 (code B ref 8307); Sat, 26 Mar 2011 07:50:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2011 07:49:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3OFM-0003Hc-3t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:49:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3OFJ-0003HO-6Y for 8307@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LIN00K00MWW8V00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 8307@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:49:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.47.180]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LIN00JPHN1X1LB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:49:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:50:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45375 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:39:30 +0100 > Cc: 8307@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 20:15, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > But the original one with the infloop is still present, if > > you remove the change I asked you to apply, yes? > > Since lexbind-new was updated I haven't been able to reproduce it > there. In the trunk I didn't see it before, and still I don't see it > now. > > So consider the problem fixed, and I'll open a new bug report if I the > bug resurfaces. I'm trying to determine whether the ZV guard is needed in that loop. I didn't commit the change I asked you to try, so it is unclear to me how it was fixed.