From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13553: 24.3.50; incorrect usage of IS_DIRECTORY_SEP Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:06:40 +0200 Message-ID: <8338xnje9r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83obgcjisd.fsf@gnu.org> <83ip6kjcy1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359270412 6565 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2013 07:06:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13553@debbugs.gnu.org, shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 27 08:07:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKb-0002lg-HG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:07:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKJ-00036L-QK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:06:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKD-00035V-Em for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKC-0000Aq-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:06:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKC-0000Am-GY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:06:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKU-0001fv-DX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13553 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13553-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13553.13592704196430 (code B ref 13553); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13553) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2013 07:06:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50975 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKR-0001ff-8q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:06:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:64617) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMKO-0001fX-MO for 13553@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MH900A00VNEGZ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13553@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:06:29 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MH900ARFVQS5CA0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:06:29 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70366 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com, 13553@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:24:37 -0500 > > CharNextExA and CharPrevExA, in my mind, do perform the moral equivalent > of decoding the argument (just in an incremental way). No, they are the equivalents of NEXT_CHAR_BOUNDARY and PREV_CHAR_BOUNDARY, except that they can do this for many different encodings, not just for UTF-8.