From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14170: 24.3; linum won't create all overlays after a folding Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:50:46 +0300 Message-ID: <8338uxbx15.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365648678 25121 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2013 02:51:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14170@debbugs.gnu.org To: E Sabof Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 11 04:51:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7bc-0001j7-TL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:51:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57957 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7bc-0006uk-HB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7bZ-0006uS-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7bY-0000R6-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7bY-0000R1-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7fB-0002jn-Tt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14170 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 14170-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14170.136564886310438 (code B ref 14170); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2013 02:54:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7eZ-0002iI-7O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:43374) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ7eU-0002hz-9i for 14170@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:54:19 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ML200400KVA8G00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14170@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:50:29 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ML2004ZIL85BW00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:50:29 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73321 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:37:55 +0100 > From: E Sabof > Cc: 14170@debbugs.gnu.org > > The reason I've noticed/reported this bug was because I was working on a > mode with a similar implementation to linum's, and got the same behavior. > This is not a linum bug. Can you show a simple test case to reproduce this bug without using linum (or any other mode that is too large)? A simple reproduction recipe is 50% of a solution. Thanks.