From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17361: Tramp does not save history across sessions. Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:15:36 +0300 Message-ID: <8338gxnwvr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bnvltvnl.fsf@gmx.de> <83ha5do4p6.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvkx8h42.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398708984 26719 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2014 18:16:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: l26wang@gmail.com, 17361@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 28 20:16:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq6C-0000FF-B5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:16:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq6B-0000QL-RS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq63-0000Q1-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq5y-0007wF-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq5y-0007vl-HM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq5x-0003nE-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17361 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17361-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17361.139870894214543 (code B ref 17361); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17361) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2014 18:15:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44097 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq5d-0003mS-DZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:15:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:51038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Weq5Z-0003m7-8S for 17361@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:15:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N4R00B006BRJI00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 17361@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:14:14 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N4R009YP6NQX420@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:14:14 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87fvkx8h42.fsf@gmx.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88373 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: l26wang@gmail.com, 17361@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:05:17 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> So we need to support several sentinels per process. > > > > Or a protocol: if you install a sentinel, and another one already > > exists, call it after yours. > > Yes. But all of the sentinels (or filters) must play the same game > then. Indeed, the protocol should be universally enforced.