From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18995: Error: Could not reserve dynamic heap area. Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 18:49:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83389spbdj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834mu9r47v.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4rlpmsr.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq75plkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbmppj4a.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3xdpiex.fsf@gnu.org> <545E81BD.8070904@dancol.org> <83egtcpd3z.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3xcqqlp.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415551825 17522 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2014 16:50:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 16:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18995@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: Alexander Shukaev Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 09 17:50:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVgt-00059N-SI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 17:50:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVgt-0005aa-84 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 11:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVgm-0005Yx-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 11:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVgh-0005i3-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 11:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVgh-0005hj-4o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 11:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVgg-00036E-NA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 11:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18995 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18995-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18995.141555180111902 (code B ref 18995); Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18995) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2014 16:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVge-00035u-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 11:50:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:58554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XnVgb-00035k-Q5 for 18995@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 11:49:58 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NES00G006G6V100@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 18995@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 18:49:56 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NES00G8R6R8QH90@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 18:49:56 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95779 > Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 17:39:32 +0100 > From: Alexander Shukaev > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dancol@dancol.org, Andreas Schwab > > Guys, don't forget one important detail, that this happens only in 32-bit > build. 64-bit does not have this problem. Sheer luck: the first call to VirtualAlloc succeeds because it asks for an amount that is much smaller than the 64-bit address space. It worked for me in 32 bits for the same reason. The problem only rears its ugly head when the first call to VirtualAlloc fails. Then we need more iterations, which don't happen.