From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 21:42:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83382dvreo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <83mw0muv5m.fsf@gnu.org> <5569AD7F.2000402@yandex.ru> <83iobautar.fsf@gnu.org> <5569BE61.7010200@yandex.ru> <83a8wmuog6.fsf@gnu.org> <5569FDCA.4030801@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433011401 4736 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2015 18:43:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 18:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 30 20:43:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyliw-0003yI-LG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 20:43:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40221 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyliv-0000lq-Q6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yylis-0000ll-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yylip-0003WQ-AC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:43:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yylip-0003WK-7R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yylio-0002W5-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 18:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.14330113379624 (code B ref 20629); Sat, 30 May 2015 18:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2015 18:42:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyli5-0002VA-An for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:41011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyli2-0002Uu-9a for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NP600I00E4MRV00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 21:33:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NP6009CLE85DT90@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Sat, 30 May 2015 21:33:41 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5569FDCA.4030801@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103381 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 21:13:30 +0300 > Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org > > This confirms that we should always disregard implicit tag when the > explicit tag is present. "Disregard" for what purposes? If all you need is the symbol name, then yes, you should always use the explicit tag.