From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21104: 25.0.50; relative paths are added to load-path without -nsl (bug#21104) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:40:58 +0200 Message-ID: <8337vcdej9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvtmcau2.fsf@gnu.org> <9aoae1wx8m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83h9jtc4eo.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449596544 16560 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2015 17:42:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esq@lawlist.com, andlind@gmail.com, 21104@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 18:42:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MHD-00040n-2t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:42:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MHC-0008Gp-8K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:42:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MH7-0008FJ-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MH4-0005Ay-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MH3-0005Ai-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MH3-0000Tv-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21104 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21104-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21104.14495964961806 (code B ref 21104); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21104) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2015 17:41:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MGe-0000T3-7o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:41:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:53548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MGb-0000Su-Jr for 21104@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:41:34 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ100J00VOG7X00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 21104@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:41:00 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ100J52VSB1N40@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:41:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109773 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Glenn Morris , esq@lawlist.com, andlind@gmail.com, 21104@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:06:11 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > (Does anyone know why we call decode_env_path with last argument zero > > in this case? I don't see how that could make any sense here.) > > In which way does that make a difference? Both "." and nil mean the > same thing, namely default-directory. Maybe I'm blind, but my reading of the code in init_lread indicates that it does make a difference: Lisp_Object sitelisp; sitelisp = decode_env_path (0, PATH_SITELOADSEARCH, 0); if (! NILP (sitelisp)) Vload_path = nconc2 (sitelisp, Vload_path); My reading of this is that if we call decode_env_path with last argument non-zero, it will return nil, and Vload_path will not be modified by adding anything. What am I missing?