From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22314: 25.1.50; Document variable `deactivate-mark' in Elisp manual Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:08:55 +0200 Message-ID: <8337u7q46w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<<88046cae-d0e4-4108-b655-5ed142ea97f7@default>>> <<<83fuyb50jl.fsf@gnu.org>>> <> <<2d847088-3f43-4771-9178-4c51081da5d5@default>> <<83oacwpcrn.fsf@gnu.org>> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452280228 12188 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2016 19:10:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22314@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 08 20:10:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcQM-0005oY-Sd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 20:10:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37770 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcQM-00005w-4H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcQI-00005f-Jb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcQE-0005rC-6V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:10:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcQE-0005r6-3k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcQD-0007SX-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:10:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22314 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22314-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22314.145228015028608 (code B ref 22314); Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22314) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2016 19:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43407 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcPO-0007RM-4q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:09:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcPM-0007RA-NL for 22314@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:09:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcPD-0005cy-4m for 22314@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:09:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcPD-0005cu-1o; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1598 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aHcPB-0007af-E7; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:08:58 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:00:28 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111393 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:00:28 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 22314@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > My bad. It is already documented. I didn't notice it because > > > it is not one of the index entries for `deactivate-mark'. > > > I think it should be. > > > > They are both indexed, AFAICS. Why did you think the variable > > isn't? > > The descriptions appear next to each other, so a single index entry > > for both seems like TRT. Am I missing something? > > I think you are. At least for me, with the latest Emacs 25 > snapshot I have (2015/12/10), `i deactivate-mark' shows two > index entries, and `,' bounces between them. They are: > (1) deactivate-mark, the function, and (2) deactivate-mark-hook, > a variable. Variable `deactivate-mark' is not one of them. > > Do you really see something different? I see the same, but I don't understand why that is a problem. The function and the variable are described one after the other, and 'i' puts you on the first of them with the second clearly visible below. How is that a problem? And how is it worse than having 2 identical index entries instead, which point each one to a place several lines apart?